, , , , , ,

FLIM-FRET Calculation for Multi Exponential Donors

Summary

This tutorial shows step-by-step, how the “Lifetime FRET Image” analysis of SymPhoTime 64 can be used to calculate pixel-by-pixel the average FRET efficiency in an image containing several cells transfected with Cerulean/YFP-constructs. To calculate the average FRET-efficiency, first the donor only lifetime is determined using cells that have only been transfected with the donor construct by performing a ROI-fit with the FLIM-analysis. The amplitude weighted average donor lifetime is used to calculate the average FRET-efficiency using the “Lifetime FRET Image” analysis.

Background information

FLIM-FRET is a robust method to determine the FRET efficiency of a suited donor acceptor pair. If the FRET-donor molecule has a more exponential decay kinetic, the amplitude weighted average lifetime has to be used to calculate the average FRET efficiency. The script usage is demonstrated on an image of several cells which have been transfected with CENP-B-Cerulean and YFP-CENP-A. Cerulean is a CFP variant an frequently used as a FRET donor. The CENP-complex consists on several proteins and is involved in mitosis. For further details on the sample, see S. Orthaus et al., Chembiochem. 2008, 9, 77-92, and the PicoQuant application note http://www.picoquant.com/images/uploads/page/ files/7267/appnote_flim_fret.pdf. The example image used is an image showing four cells, two of them only transfected with the CENP-B-Cerulean complex, the other two transfected with both constructs. Therefore, the same image can be used to determine the donor only lifetime and also to perform the pixel-by-pixel fit to calculate the FRET efficiency.

Step-by-Step Tutorial

Note: This Step-by-Step tutorial was written for SymPhoTime version 2.5. There might be slight differences compared to other software versions. For example the way of setting an intensity threshold has changed. In the video the former version is shown.

Determine the donor only lifetime using the FLIM analysis

Note:
The “Samples” workspace is delivered with the SymPhoTime 64 and on the CD-ROM-drive and contains example data to show the function of the SymPhoTime data analysis. If you haven't installed it on your computer, copy it from the the DVD onto a local drive before going through this tutorial.

Response:
The files of the sample workspace are displayed in the workspace panel on the left side of the main window.

Note:
The drop down menu can be opened and closed by clicking on the grey button on the left side of the header of the drop down menu:

Response:
The FLIM script is applied to the file CENP-labelled_cells_for_FRET.ptu. Thereby, a new Window opens:

Note:
The window contains five different regions:
Upper left: Imaging analysis options.
Upper center: Fast FLIM image, displayed in false color scale. The brightness encodes the intensity while the color encodes the average “Fast FLIM” lifetime, i.e. the mean arrival times of the photons after the laser pulse. When not defined otherwise, intensity and color scale stretch from minimum to maximum. As the mean arrival time of the background photons in the areas where no fluorescence is detected, is randomly spread over the TCSPC window, the mean photon arrival time of the dark background is usually very long (up to 1/2 of the TCSPC window), which makes the color scale loaded by default sometimes unsuited for displaying the lifetime contrast in the actual sample. In this case, the scale has to be adapted.
Upper right: Fluorescence Lifetime Histogram. Here the frequency of photon counts corresponding to the individual mean lifetimes is plotted. The settings of the plot can be adapted using the controls on the right of the plot.
Lower left: Lifetime fitting parameters. Here lifetime fitting models can be defined. Fitting is then applied to the lifetime graph(s) in the TCSPC histogram.
Lower center/left: By default, this set shows the TCSPC histogram of all photons in the image in green (= dataset 0) and the TCSPC histogram of a single pixel in grey (= dataset 1). In red an estimation of the instrument response function (=IRF) is shown. The IRF reconstruction is deducted from the rising edge of the TCSPC histogram.

Response:
The image and the graphs are recalculated, using photons only from channel 2.

Response:
The image scales are adapted.

Note:
Now four cells are visible, the two nuclei on the left have longer Fast lifetimes then the other two. These are the cells transfected only with the donor constructs.

Note:
For more information about the different ROI selection tools, check the tutorial ROI fitting using the FLIM script.

Response:

Response:

Note:
The software offers the possibility to fit the data using a n-exponential tailfit, a n-exponential reconvolution fit or a rapid reconvolution fit. A tailfit can be used when the fitted lifetimes are significantly longer than the instrument response function. Still a reconvolution fit is usually preferable, especially for FRET determinations, because the complete decay is fitted, while for a tailfit, the start of the fitting range is usually a bit arbitrary, and the short component can be underestimated. The rapid reconvolution model is used for systems with rapid reconvolution electronics (e.g. hybrid PMA-detector + MultiHarp photon counting board), where the peak count rates have been significantly higher than the pile up limit, or in cases, where the repetition rate has been too high to fit the decay completely into the TCSPC-window, e.g. 2PE excitation with 80MHz and dyes with a lifetime above ~3ns. For explanation on the fitting model and the used equations, click on the “Help” button next to the selected model. This opens a help window containing the fitting equation and the explanation of the different parameters.

Response:
The TCSPC curve of ROI 0 is highlighted in green.

Response:
A window opens, where the file containing the IRF can be selected.

Note:
This file contains a measured instrument response function (IRF) of detector 2. The best way to measure an instrument response function is measuring a dye that is highly quenched in a saturated solution of KI. See e.g. Szabelski et al., Appl. Spectrosc. 2009, 63, 363-368.

Response:
The decay of the imported IRF is shown in grey in the TCSPC window.

Response:
The imported IRF is highlighted in red.

Note:
In this case, the decay is double exponential. As it is not the scope of the tutorial to explain standard lifetime fitting (see the tutorial “ROI fitting using the FLIM script”), we skip the steps of finding the correct fitting model here.

Response:The fit is calculated.

Note:
The fitted lifetime can slightly differ depending on the ROI drawn. It is important to use the amplitude weighted average lifetime. While the intensity weighted average lifetime corresponds to the real average arrival time of the photons and is therefore also close to the Fast lifetime in case of low background noise, the amplitude weighted average lifetime reflects the quenching of the donor due to the FRET process and therefore the total drop of intensity. To see the definitions of both averages, click on the “Help” button next to the fitting model.

Response:
A result file (FLIM.pqres) is stored under the raw data file (CENP-labelled_cells_for_FRET.ptu).

Calculate the FRET efficiency image using the FLIM-FRET script

Response:
The “Lifetime FRET Image” script is applied to the file CENP-labelled _cells_for_FRET.ptu. Thereby, a new Window opens:

The window contains five different regions: Upper left: Imaging analysis options
Upper center: Fast FLIM image, displayed in false color scale. The brightness encodes the intensity while the color encodes the average “Fast FLIM” lifetime, i.e. the mean arrival times of the photons after the laser pulse. When not defined otherwise, intensity and color scale stretch from minimum to maximum. As the mean arrival time of the background photons in the areas where no fluorescence is detected, is randomly spread over the TCSPC window, the mean photon arrival time of the dark background is usually very long (up to 1/2 of the TCSPC window), which makes the color scale loaded by default sometimes unsuited for displaying the lifetime contrast in the actual sample. In this case, the scale has to be adapted.
Upper right: Fluorescence FRET Efficiency Histogram. As the FRET efficiency image has not been calculated yet, this plot is still empty. Later, the settings of the plot can be adapted using the controls on the right of the plot.
Lower left: Binding histogram. As the FRET efficiency image has not been calculated yet, this histogram is also still empty. As this diagram can only be calculated if the FRET donor dye has single exponential decay kinetics, changing the fitting model results in an exchange of this graph to a FRET distance histogram.
Lower center/left: TCSPC histogram of all photons in the image in green (= dataset 0) and the TCSPC histogram of a single pixel in grey (= dataset 1). In red an estimation of the instrument response function (=IRF) is shown. The IRF reconstruction is deducted from the rising edge of the images TCSPC histogram. On the left of this graph, the fitting model and parameter controls are displayed.

Response:
The pixel binning is applied to the image and the image is recalculated, using only photons from detector channel 2.

Response:
A large window with three sections will appear, where you can set a threshold for an image analysis visually.

Note:
Left to right: Preview FLIM Image, Intensity Histogram and Lifetime Histogram. For any ROI you can set each of these parameters individually. There are two ways to define the new threshold. You can use the edit-box at the lower side to type the threshold and press enter to check the result or use cursor keys or mouse wheel to increase/decrease the value. Another option is using the blue vertical bars on the sides of the intensity or lifetime histograms; click and drag the bars to set the threshold.

Response: In the image, only pixels with higher photon counts are highlighted. (eventually adapt the intensity maximum to see the highlighted pixels more clearly).

Response:The imported IRF is highlighted in red.

Note:
If a mixture of complexes performing FRET and not performing FRET is present, the decay can of course be more complex, as the Cerulean alone already shows a bi-exponential decay behavior. However, the limited number of photons per pixel does not allow to use a more complex model.

Note:
Whether you need to type “2.66” or “2,66” depends on the country specific settings of Windows program. For this tutorial, a computer with German specific settings was used, therefore, the decimal digits are separated with “,” instead of “.”.

Response:The fit is performed to the ROI decay.

Note:
In order to reduce statistical fluctuations, as many parameters as possible need to be set constant. In a single pixel, the background counts of the pixel are negligible, therefore it is valid to set this to 0 in this case. Don't press “Initial Fit again”.

Note:
Depending on the screen resolution, one may have to use the scroll-bar in order to access this button.

Response:

Note:
The FRET efficiencies calculated also show values below 0. Although physically impossible, mathematically this reflects the variation in the fit.

Note:
To transfer the distance into a nanometer scale, the real Förster distance must be known. The result is only meaningful, if the donor to acceptor ratio is 1:1 on the molecular level for each complex. This is not the case in our biological example with a more complex stoichiometry, therefore the graph is meaningless in this specific case.

Calculating the real Förster distance requires some effort and distinct knowledge about the sample. A few aids are available on the lab. These are not connected to PicoQuant and PicoQuant is not responsible neither for the content nor any possible errors; still these links may give an idea of what is required to calculate Förster distances.


Response:
A result file is saved and linked to the raw data file.