some_origins_of_multiexponetial_decays_for_single_dyes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
some_origins_of_multiexponetial_decays_for_single_dyes [2015/11/03 14:09] – admin | some_origins_of_multiexponetial_decays_for_single_dyes [2019/03/06 12:44] – admin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
- | Note that this situation corresponds to the typical case of Static-Quenching in which the intensity of A decreases with the concentration of X, but where the lifetime $\tau_A$ remains constant. | + | Note that this situation corresponds to the typical case of Static-Quenching in which the intensity of $A$ decreases with the concentration of $X$, but where the lifetime $\tau_A$ remains constant. |
===== 2) Excited-state reactions ===== | ===== 2) Excited-state reactions ===== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Scheme 2 | Scheme 2 | ||
- | //Starting point: The molecule A is prompted | + | //Starting point: The molecule A is promoted |
//Case A) The constant kAB is too slow with respect to $\tau_A$ and $\tau_B$.// In this case the compound A would decay to the ground-sate before the excited-state reaction could take place. The decay measured would be single exponential and coincident with $\tau_A$. | //Case A) The constant kAB is too slow with respect to $\tau_A$ and $\tau_B$.// In this case the compound A would decay to the ground-sate before the excited-state reaction could take place. The decay measured would be single exponential and coincident with $\tau_A$. | ||
- | //Case B) The forward reaction constant | + | //Case B) The forward reaction constant |
Note that this situation is the typical case of dynamic quenching with the particular case that the product being formed is fluorescent. | Note that this situation is the typical case of dynamic quenching with the particular case that the product being formed is fluorescent. | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
//Case C) The interconversion rate constants kAB and kBA are in the same order of $\tau_A$ and $\tau_B$.// In this case, the decay curves measured for species A and B would be biexponential for both, with common lifetimes $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$. However, $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$ would not correspond to $\tau_A$ or $\tau_B$ , but would be a function of both and of their interconversion rate constants kAB and kBA, as well as of the concentration of X. The system would have to be solved mathematically. For a system like in Scheme 2 the time evolution of species A and B would be: | //Case C) The interconversion rate constants kAB and kBA are in the same order of $\tau_A$ and $\tau_B$.// In this case, the decay curves measured for species A and B would be biexponential for both, with common lifetimes $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$. However, $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$ would not correspond to $\tau_A$ or $\tau_B$ , but would be a function of both and of their interconversion rate constants kAB and kBA, as well as of the concentration of X. The system would have to be solved mathematically. For a system like in Scheme 2 the time evolution of species A and B would be: | ||
- | A(t) = A1 e^{-t/$\tau_1$} + A2 e^{-t/$\tau_2$} | + | $A(t) = A_1 e^{-t/ |
- | B(t) = B1 e^{-t/$\tau_1$} + B2 e^{-t/$\tau_2$} | + | $B(t) = B_1 e^{-t/ |
where: | where: | ||
- | $\tau_1$= 2/(M+Y-Z) | + | $\tau_1= 2/(M+Y-Z)$ |
- | $\tau_2$ = 2/(M+Y+Z) | + | $\tau_2 = 2/(M+Y+Z)$ |
- | being M = kAB[x] + kA (summation of disappearance constant of compound A; kA=1/$\tau_A$ ) | + | being $M = k_{AB}[x] + k_A$ (summation of disappearance constant of compound |
- | being Y = kBA + kB (summation of disappearance constant of compound B; kB=1/$\tau_B$) | + | being $Y = k_{BA} |
- | being Z = [ (M-Y)^2 + 4 kAB kBA[x]]^(1/2) | + | being $Z = \sqrt{(M-Y)^2 + 4 k_{AB} k_{BA}[x]}$ |
- | A1= A0 [M- (1/$\tau_2$)] / [(1/$\tau_1$ – 1/$\tau_2$] | + | $A_1= A_0 [M- (1/\tau_2)] / [(1/\tau_1 – 1/\tau_2]$ |
- | A2= A0 [(1/$\tau_1$)- M] / [(1/$\tau_1$ – 1/$\tau_2$] | + | $A_2= A_0 [(1/ |
- | B1= A0 kAB [x] / [(1/$\tau_1$ – 1/$\tau_2$] | + | $B_1= -A_0 k_{AB}[x] / [(1/\tau_1 – 1/\tau_2]$ |
- | B2= -A0 kAB [x] / [(1/$\tau_1$ – 1/$\tau_2$] | + | $B_2= A_0 k_{AB} |
- | being A0 the concentration of A at t=0. | + | being $A_0$ the concentration of $A$ at $t=0$. |
- | **Note from A(t) that, even if B would not be fluorescent, | + | **Note from $A(t)$ that, even if $B$ would not be fluorescent, |
A situation like this may occur with molecules dissolved in an aprotic but hygroscopic media, like acetonirile. Water molecules may diffuse (diffusion happens in the nanosecond time scale) and react with fluorophores bearing proton-transfer groups like -OH or -NH2. | A situation like this may occur with molecules dissolved in an aprotic but hygroscopic media, like acetonirile. Water molecules may diffuse (diffusion happens in the nanosecond time scale) and react with fluorophores bearing proton-transfer groups like -OH or -NH2. | ||
- | //Case D) Interconversion rate constants | + | //Case D) Interconversion rate constants |
This situation may happen if compounds A and X were directly in contact prior to excitation, for example throgh ground-state interactions. | This situation may happen if compounds A and X were directly in contact prior to excitation, for example throgh ground-state interactions. | ||
- | |||
===== 3) Solvation dynamics ===== | ===== 3) Solvation dynamics ===== | ||
some_origins_of_multiexponetial_decays_for_single_dyes.txt · Last modified: 2019/03/19 12:31 by oschulz