User Tools

Site Tools


howto:t3r_antibunching_-_slow_decay

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
howto:t3r_antibunching_-_slow_decay [2022/02/01 10:52] – [Q.: How can we avoid decay at very long time delay (up to 5us)?] peterhowto:t3r_antibunching_-_slow_decay [2022/02/01 11:32] (current) – [A decay caused by correlation statistics] peter
Line 4: Line 4:
  
  
-==== In this show-case the external preconditions are: ==== 
  
-- detectors: perkin elmer SPCMAQR14 
  
-- 700 nm SP filter in front of one of the APDs+==== A decay caused by correlation statistics ====
  
-- samplediamond nanocrystals (100 nm), we are measuring the antibunching of the NV centers emission+[{{howto:slope.png ?478x300|Fig. 1: Baseline decay }}]
  
-- laser wavelength: 532 nm, cw 
- 
-- T3R Measurement with PicoHarp Software  
- 
-===== A.: The decay can be caused by blinking of the nanodiamonds. ===== 
-==== A decay caused by correlation statistics ==== 
 This decay is caused by correlation statistics. This happens because you correlate the first arriving photon against a photon at the longer time, which will be an increasingly unlikely event because the earliest stop photons always win and the experiment restarts. This decay is caused by correlation statistics. This happens because you correlate the first arriving photon against a photon at the longer time, which will be an increasingly unlikely event because the earliest stop photons always win and the experiment restarts.
  
-I attached a simulation+simulation with 90ns dead-time period: 
  
-[{{howto:logf.png?320x240|Fig. 1Logfile logf.png }}]+[{{howto:logf.png?320x240|Fig. 2Simulation }}]
  
  
howto/t3r_antibunching_-_slow_decay.txt · Last modified: 2022/02/01 11:32 by peter