User Tools

Site Tools


howto:align_beam_backreflection

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
howto:align_beam_backreflection [2015/11/05 16:41] sisamakishowto:align_beam_backreflection [2015/11/06 10:19] sisamakis
Line 7: Line 7:
 This is indeed normal, it is the result of using polarised light. Perfect alignment is reached when the lobes are more or less symmetric, that means they have roughly the same intensity. To reach this, you have to precisely position the beam to enter at the center of the objective entrance pupil, and the beam must be of course aligned with the optical axis of the objective. (Note that parallel beam displacement, not tilting, is necessary.)  This is indeed normal, it is the result of using polarised light. Perfect alignment is reached when the lobes are more or less symmetric, that means they have roughly the same intensity. To reach this, you have to precisely position the beam to enter at the center of the objective entrance pupil, and the beam must be of course aligned with the optical axis of the objective. (Note that parallel beam displacement, not tilting, is necessary.) 
  
-{{:howto:backreflection_defocused.mp4|}}+{{:howto:backreflection_defocused1.mp4|}}
  
 The classic paper by E. Wolf "Electromagnetic Diffraction in Optical Systems. II." shows some 4 lobed patterns for polarized light.   http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/253/1274/358 The classic paper by E. Wolf "Electromagnetic Diffraction in Optical Systems. II." shows some 4 lobed patterns for polarized light.   http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/253/1274/358
Line 14: Line 14:
  Adding a drop of water on top of the cover slip reduces the back-scattering intensity by an order of magnitude or so, but the basic shape remains the same. Even if one removes everything extra from the beam path, these fringes remain there, they are universal. There are a lot of surfaces, coatings, etc., perfectly aligned in order to obtain such an image. Interferences are unavoidable, note that all those images reported above are slightly defocused.   Adding a drop of water on top of the cover slip reduces the back-scattering intensity by an order of magnitude or so, but the basic shape remains the same. Even if one removes everything extra from the beam path, these fringes remain there, they are universal. There are a lot of surfaces, coatings, etc., perfectly aligned in order to obtain such an image. Interferences are unavoidable, note that all those images reported above are slightly defocused. 
  
-Such images are used for the daily and fundamental alignment of the MicroTime 200. The detailed procedure is described in the user manual of MicroTIme 200. Although the MicroTime is extremely robust we suggest its sers to spend 5-10 minutes every day for verifying the quality of the alignment by inspecting the backreflection pattern. +Such images are used for the daily and fundamental alignment of the MicroTime 200. The detailed procedure is described in the user manual of MicroTIme 200. Although the MicroTime is extremely robust we suggest its sers to spend 5-10 minutes every day for verifying the quality of the alignment by inspecting the backreflection pattern. Have a look how this is used also by watching the tutorial [[howto:exchange_dichroic_mt200|How to exchange the main dichroic of the MicroTIme 200.]]
  
  
howto/align_beam_backreflection.txt · Last modified: 2022/08/29 11:17 by peter